The Song Of Songs

This essay The Song Of Songs has a total of 1110 words and 11 pages.






The Song of Songs



CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION 1

Canonicity 1

Authorship and Dating 2

INTERPRETATION 4

Allegorical 4

Literal 5

Wedding Cycle 5

Pastoral Drama 6

CONCLUSION 6





INTRODUCTION



The Song of Songs, or Song of Solomon, is a unique book in the Old Testament canon. The book

contains exquisitely beautiful lyric poetry, full of sensuous symbolism. Because of the sexual nature of

Song of Songs, the message of this book has been debated for the past eighteen-hundred years. The erotic

content of this book has lead it into canonicity problems and authorship problems. These issues have

become central to the interpretation of the Song of Songs.





Canonicity

The issue of the canonicity of Song of Songs was a major subject of debate at the 90 A.D. Council

of Jamnia. Jewish Rabbis from across the spectrum of Judaism assembled in order to close in Jewish

Canon. At that time, many rabbis who opposed the Song of Songs and other works toke the opportunity to

argue against their inclusion in Jewish Canon. It was the Palestinian rabbinical school of Shammai that

stood in the fore of the opposition for canonization of Song of Songs. They argued that nothing could be

considered scripture that was being employed in lewd, barroom songs. Fortunately the cause of Song of

Songs was championed by the less stringent Babylonian rabbinical school of Hillel. "The entire universe

is not as worthy as the day on which the Song of Songs was given to Israel, for all the Writings are holy,

but the Song of Songs are the Holy of Hollies." Lead by the defense of Rabbi Aqiba, the Hillal school

succeeded in maintaining the canonicity of Song of Songs!

.





Authorship and Dating

While the different schools represented at the Council of Jamnia may have held opposing views of

the canonicity and interpretation, both held to the belief that King Solomon was the author of the work. It

was not until the advent of modern textual criticism that questions began to arise over the authorship of

Song of Solomon. The view now held by the majority of biblical scholars is that Song of Solomon, in

reality, may have nothing more to do with Solomon than use of his name. Instead, scholars believe that

Song of Songs represents a conglomeration of smaller love poems or songs. These poems, 20 to 30 in all,

were collected by an unknown editor(s) for their consistent themes, and placed in the anthology which is

found today.

Unfortunately, the nature of Song of Songs as an anthological work precludes precise dating of the

material. However, there are several textual clues within the work which allow for citing a general range of

years. The naming of the city of Tirzah in 6:4 is evidence that the compilation must have occurred

sometime before 876 B.C. This is because Tirzah, compared to Jerusalem in the verse, ceased to be the

capital of Israel in 876 B.C. when Omri moved the Northern capital to Samaria. Further evidence used to

limit the possible span of years is found in the presence of Aramaic, Persian, and Greek words in the text.

The presence of these words means that the work antedates the sixth century B.C. All internal evidence

considered, the best dating available places the compilation of Song of Songs between 400 and 300 B.C.







INTERPRETATION



Allegorical

First among the four primary, modern approaches to the interpretation of Song of Songs is the

Allegorical approach. This view of Song of Songs is one of the two oldest interpretations, and was

forwarded by the Midrash, Targum, and Medieval Jewish commentators. This interpretation states that the

intended message of Song of Songs is an allegory of God and Israel. The succession of events flows from

the Sinai Covenant through subsequent events. Later, the early church fathers adapted this view to

Christianity by changing the role of Israel to that of the Church.



Literal

The second of the two oldest interpretations of Song of Songs is the literal approach. At one time

held by a few Jewish rabbis, this view fell out of acceptance in leu of the allegorical interpretation. Among

the Christian fathers who accepted this approach were Theodore of Mopsuestia and Sebastian Castellio,

both of whom were criticized for their opinion. The literal view saw Song of Songs as nothing more than a

collection of love poems. Useful for exemplifying the nature of Godly love, but otherwise only poems.





Wedding Cycle

Among the more recent interpretations proposed by Christians is the wedding cycle. This

interpretation is basically

Read essay without registering

Donate an essay now and get the full essay emailed you




Acceptable files: .txt, .doc, .docx, .rtf

Email Address

Topics Related to The Song Of Songs

Solomon, Books of Kings, Erotic poetry, Ketuvim, Passover, Song of Songs, Development of the Hebrew Bible canon, Bible, Council of Jamnia, Development of the Old Testament canon, Midrash, jewish rabbis, testament canon, king solomon, rabbinical school, song of solomon, song of songs, lyric poetry, shammai, erotic content, major subject, canonization, old testament, barroom, sexual nature, hillel, authorship, introduction 1, opposing views, hundred years, rabbi

Essays Related to The Song Of Songs