This essay Descartes' Sixth Meditation has a total of 948 words and 4 pages.
Descartes' Sixth Meditation
Descartes’ Sixth Meditation
In Descartes’ Sixth Meditation, Descartes argues about the existence of material things. The base of his argument relies solely on the claim that God created himself and would never deceive him. According to Descartes, God being deceiving is absurd. In this paper, I will reconstruct Descartes’ argument and explain why I believe his argument for the existence of material things to be valid, but not sound.
In Descartes’ argument about the existence of material things, he argues that before he can argue that material things actually exists, he has to display that bodies could actually exists. Descartes believes that God can generate anything as long as it doesn’t produce an inconsistency. He believed that God would not allow him to have ideas and not cause their other objects to also exist. This is what leads Descartes to believe that material things do exist.
The Sixth Meditation clearly displays Descartes reasoning for the existence of material things. The premises are disbursed starting with the first idea that one can grasp the meaning of themselves without having fancy thoughts, but they can’t figure out their thoughts without giving them to something that comprehends those thoughts. He then goes on to say that he has the ability to move and only extended things have that power. This, therefore, would mean that he is an extended body. Essentially, this means that imagination is not a mandatory property of one’s mind since we can still exist without it and as we can experience different feelings, this mean that we are extended things. Descartes then goes on to explain passive and active sense.
According to Descartes, every sensory experience he has ever thought of while being awake, he can also think of while he’s asleep. This leads us to his fourth premise that intuition is not required to experience something, because obviously the senses that are being experienced are not his decision. Therefore, he says that this faculty is something other than just himself, due to the fact that he clearly did not use any thought on his part. He also says that the senses that are being experienced must be created by a higher power of some sort that has some reality in the ideas that are being produced. This means that a high power has to be in charge of the senses that one is experiencing because the senses are beyond what he could actually imagine feeling. This then leads us to the last few premises.
Descartes believes that there is a higher power controlling as of his senses, which leads to the seventh premise that Descartes believes the high power to be God or some kind of external extended body. Then he goes on to say that God is not malicious enough to deceive someone and that God has actually never given him a way of recognizing this higher power, but God has strongly encouraged him to believe that bodies actually produce the senses. The explanation of this is that Descartes believes that he is not controlling the senses that he experiences. His belief is that a higher power is controlling the sensory perception that he experiences. But God does not want him to believe that a higher power is what is controlling this sensory, God wants him to believe that bodies control the sensory perception that they have. These premises lead to the last premise and conclusion of Descartes argument of material things existing.
The last premise before the conclusion is that if ones sensory perception does not come from bodies and bodies do not produce senses, then that would make God a deceiver. But Descartes does not see God as a deceiver, because there is no way that God could be a deceiver. The thought of God being a deceiver is berserk to say the least. A simpler way to interpret Descartes’ suggestion that if bodies do not produce senses, then God is a deceiver is to look back at the previous premise that says God has inclined Descartes to believe that bodies produce sensory perception. This means that if it came down to bodies not producing senses, then God would have lied to Descartes. Following this premise is the conclusion. The conclusion to Descartes argument is that material objects do
Topics Related to Descartes' Sixth Meditation
Epistemology, Ren Descartes, Belief, Thought, Existence of God, Reason, Philosophy of self, God, Meditations on First Philosophy, Cartesian doubt
Essays Related to Descartes' Sixth Meditation
HinduismHinduism Hinduism Introduction Hinduism is a religion that originated in India and is still practiced by most of the Natives as well as the people who have migrated from India to other parts of the world. Statistically there are over seven hundred million Hindus, mainly in Bharat, India and Nepal. Eighty five percent of the population in India is Hindu. The word Hindu comes from an ancient Sanskrit term meaning dwellers by the Indus River, referring to the location of India's earliest know civ
George BerkleyGeorge Berkley As man progressed through the various stages of evolution, it is assumed that at a certain point he began to ponder the world around him. Of course, these first attempts fell short of being scholarly. As time passed on, though, these ideas persisted and were eventually tackled by the more intellectual, so-called philosophers. This, excavation of the external world began. As the authoritarianism of the ancients gave way to the more liberal views of the modernists, two main position
Berkeleys Theory Of Immaterialism Berkeley's Theory of Immaterialism As man progressed through the various stages of evolution, it is assumed that at a certain point he began to ponder the world around him. Of course, these first attempts fell short of being scholarly, probably consisting of a few grunts and snorts at best. As time passed on, though, these ideas persisted and were eventually tackled by the more intellectual, so-called philosophers. Thus, excavation of the external world began. As the authoritarinism of the an
The Epistemology of Cindy Sherman: A Research Method for Media and CHumanities research is widely considered to be the sole province of academic scholars, yet avant-garde artists practise their own versions of humanities research. As critics, we tend to applaud the avant-garde for its anti-linear, anti-rational, anti-Enlightenment qualities, but we do so even as we continue to reproduce the same form of criticism, employing linearity, rationality, and the rhetoric of scientific realism. Avant-garde artists invent research methods by using media as research tools
Comparison of Max Weber and Emile Durkheim: , how we can gain knowledgSociological theorists Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) and Max Weber (1864-1920) are commonly regarded as two of the foremost comparative analysts in the history of sociology. Both theorists during the course of their careers produced major theoretical and methodological statements. Throughout this essay I will examine their methodology on social reality, how we can gain knowledge from their ontological position and their theory of knowledge, by focusing on their writings about religion. Both Emile D
Dipesh Kuwar Dipesh Kuwar ENG 553 Literary Criticism Roll No: 181 Sec: â€˜E\' 28 June 2016 M. H Abraham characterizes â€˜Romanticism\' not in terms of the â€˜Mirror\' but the â€˜Lamp\' Romanticism is antithetical eighteenth century Neo-Classism, rather continuation of already established literary and artistic trends. English Romantic era started with the frustration of approaching industrialism, French Revolutions, rumors of the war and so much political and cultural shifting in late eighteen century. Abram
Introduction to Philosophy- Midterm Exam Study Que Introduction to Philosophy- Midterm Exam Study Questions CCNY Fall 2016 Phil 10200 Plato's Euthyphro , Apology , and Crito , Martin Luther King Jr How does Euthyphro attempt to define 'piety,' and how does Socrates go about showing that those proposed definitions are insufficient? Where does Euthyphro meet Socrates? Why are they both there? What were the charges against Socrates? How does he defend himself against them? How did Socrates eventually come to understand the meaning of the oracle? W
CCNY PHIL 102 00 Section L : Introduction to Philo CCNY PHIL 102 00 Section L : Introduction to Philosophy Fall 201 6 Professor: Damion K. Scott Classroom: NAC 1/203 Office: NAC 5/144 Class Hours: Tu/Thu 9:30 - 10:45am Phone: (347) Â 581 4653 Office Hours: By Appointment Email: [email protected] Required Texts : Plato The Trial and Death of Socrates. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2000. Descartes, Rene Meditations on First Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1993. Kant, Immanuel Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics 1783 King,