"Has been a lifesaver so many times!"
- Catherine Rampell, student @ University of Washington
"Exactly the help I needed."
- Jennifer Hawes, student @ San Jose State
"The best place for brainstorming ideas."
- Michael Majchrowicz, student @ University of Kentucky
Government Should Establish Program To Reduce Juvenile Crime
Juvenile crime is increasing rapidly and is a problem that plagues
America. The murder rate by 18 year olds has increased 467% since 1965! The
current policy maintained for the last number of decades is clearly not
effective. An increase of 207% in the number of murder cases committed by 15
year olds from 1985 to 1993 is not a sign that current policy is effective.
Changes must be made. The best way to address the problem is through government
funded preventative programs. The affirmative intends to prove, and stands
resolved, that the federal government should establish a program to
substantially reduce juvenile crime.
This, by definition, means that the federal government would benefit the
country by taking action and making government programs that will decrease the
number of crimes committed by minors. Contention I: The status quo is only
harming the people of the united states by remaining. Subpoint A: It has become
clear that the state and local governments have failed in correcting the
nation wide epidemic of juvenile crime, since juvenile crime rates are rising so
rapidly. Subpoint 1:An example of an ineffective state plan is that many
states are attempting to incarcerate juveniles along with adults. Putting
juvenile offenders in with adults increases their chances offending again when
they are released by 65%. Subpoint 2: SHOCAP, a local crime reduction plan,
was shut down because it was ineffective. Subpoint B: Local plans are too
diverse and lack uniformity. Subpoint 1: A plan that can lift up the entire
country are far superior to those that can only effect small parts.. Iowa may
indeed have smaller problems than New York but Juvenile crime exists everywhere.
Subpoint 2:In the hands of the federal government, a more effective, tax worthy
and moral shaping plan can be spread throughout the entire united states and
benefit the country as a whole. Utilizing this information from the faults and
few successes of the states, will help correctly fund and perfect an active plan
which will indeed begin to substantially reduce juvenile crime, before it
happens...through the methods of prevention.
The plan that we the affirmative propose is one that institutes a
combination of different preventative programs which the federal government will
entirely set up, fund, and work with these community efforts.
Plank I: This preventative program will be funded through the
organization of juvenile justice and delinquency prevention program, a federal
agency which consists of 17 separate groups involved in delinquency prevention.
They are equipped with 144 million dollars with which they can assist the
communities to create these life saving programs. Money will come both from
them and federal government funding. The government pays money to the states to
use their own programs to diminish juvenile crime, but because this has proven
ineffective through the rising juvenile crime rates, this money can be better
used on federal programs. We must recognize how much this problem is hurting us,
and be prepared to pay taxes . But with the help of the organization of
juvenile justice, the taxes should be minimal.
Plank II: The OJJDP will encourage these preventative plans with and
through the federal government to the states. This organization will consist of
the current members, plus volunteers and paid officials who will work in
communities all over the U.S.
Plank III: Mandates
Mandate 1. Schools will teach choice exercises, discourage violence and
teach law and consequences to younger children in public elementary schools all
over the country. It is obvious from the crime rates that children are not
learning simple morals in their homes! Materials would be supplied through the
federal government. This method which will help the youth of tomorrow to think
about situations before impulsively acting on them.
Mandate 2. ?Street workers? will work with juveniles. Boston has had
wonderful success with street workers, volunteer conflict resolution officers.
Their job is to talk to groups of children and teens who hang out on city
streets. Supplying such a program to large cities all over the country would
prove beneficial to both the youths and people of the communities. Also, peer
mediation, similar to street workers, has proved successful in many schools
across the country, and bringing it to all schools will help many more children.
Mandate 3.Schools, gyms, churches, community centers and parks should be
encouraged to supply supervised after school activities which can be funded by
the federal government. Children take to the streets when they are left home
alone while parents are working. This is a preventative method of giving
something for youths to say yes to while bringing out their talents.
Mandate 4. Juveniles who have already been in trouble need professional
counseling. Fully funded counciling , similar to drug
View Full Essay
Criminology, Criminal justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, United States Department of Justice, Juvenile delinquency, Resolution, Juvenile court, Juvenile delinquency in the United States, Youth incarceration in the United States, juvenile crime rates, state and local governments, preventative programs, murder cases, murder rate, crime reduction, 15 year olds, juvenile offenders, 18 year olds, government programs, plagues, contention, uniformity, epidemic, faults, federal government, crimes, decades, adults, united states
More Free Essays Like This