The Theory of Evolution

The theory of evolution, as set forth by Charles Darwin in 1859, stated that all plant and animal life evolved

over long periods of time from simple to more complicated forms through mutation and adaptation. He

also taught that only the fittest of each species would survive. He further postulated that the first living cell

evolved in a "warm warm little pond" and that it took billions of years for the present diversity of living

things to evolve. At the time, it was thought that the few "missing links" in the fossil record would be soon

filled.(Darwin, 1927 ). Today, however, there is today a considerable body of scientific evidence that

refutes this entire theory. The findings of the last 50 years both deny the possibility of Darwin's

theory and make a very good case for creationism. Creationism is the belief that all of life came into being

suddenly, that it still exists in much the same form, and that the earth is much younger than Darwin

thought. The Law of Biogen!

esis states that life only comes from life. The Harvard University Nobel Prize winner (in physiology and

medicine) George Wald wrote(1954) that "the reasonable view was to believe in spontaneous generation,"

(evolution). He said "the only alternative is to believe in a single, primary act of supernatural creation,"

and "there is no third position." He explains the impossible odds of spontaneous generation, and yet

refuses to accept the alternative. Later, he attempted to find whether a single amino acid change in a

hemoglobin mutation could be found that doesn't adversely affect the function of that hemoglobin. He was

unable to find such an instance. He also explored the interactions between proteins, amino acids, and

oxygen, with energy sources such as the earth's heat and the sun's radiation. He concluded that "the

overwhelming tendency for chemical reactions to move in the direction opposite to that required for the

evolution of life to be the most stubborn problem t!

hat confronts us - the weakest link in our argument [for the origin of life]."(Wald,1967).

Mendel's Laws explain most of the physical variations observed in living things. Genes, the genetic units of

heredity, are merely reshuffled from one generation to another, but new genes are never formed. Different

combinations create variations, but these variations are limited. Each cow, person, dog, etc. has variations,

but the genetic units do not permit dog-people, or cow-dogs. Breeding experiments by competent

biologists confirm that these boundaries exist.(Fix,1984). Since mutations are the only mechanism

(according to Darwin) by which new genetic material becomes available, then mutations must have

occurred regularly to have spawned all our present life forms, and further, mutation must consistently go

from simple to complex to have gotten us out of the primordial ooze. However, many noted biologists,

including C.P. Martin and Theodosius Dobzhansky (who mutated the fruit fly), consistently report that

mutation does produce hereditary changes, but "invariably affec!

t it (the organism) adversely."(Salisbury, 1969). All animals are born with complex organs (the human

brain has over a hundred thousand billion electrical connections), and further, all animals are born with

fully developed organs. If evolution were occurring, at some point people could expect to see a reptile

whose leg was becoming a wing, but they never have. Darwin himself attempted to answer a question put

to him by Harvard biology professor Asa Gray, regarding the eye, and whether the "inimitable contrivances

for adjusting the focus to different distances, and for the correct ionospherical and chromatic aberration,

could have been formed by natural selection. This seems..... absurd in the highest degree."(Darwin,1927).

Genetic and molecular biologists can now measure the degree of similarity between most forms of life by

examining the sequence of the components of a specific protein. Relationship is established by the number

of changes required to convert a protein o!

f one organism in to the corresponding protein of another - the fewer changes, the closer the relationship.

This comparison can also be made using genetic material. There is NO evidence on the molecular level for

evolution. Each of the many categories of organisms appear to be equally isolated. For example, by

isolating one protein (cytochromec) from a snake and comparing it with 47 different life forms, it was

shown that the rattlesnake was most similar to man, not to any other reptile(based on that one

protein).(Gray,1980). If evolution had occurred, that contradiction, and hundreds